An actual Metphistopheles Post!

Last seen here years ago, he rises from the ashes,.... no. Bad metaphor on this occasion.  But it took seeing live shots from Citi Field last night, and video of Shea from not quite 20 years before, to bring back some conceptual stuff here.

So this meme has been popping up on and off for a few months now:

When it came back around a few days ago, I finally realized how I related to it.

You see,there's another mysterious place like it which I know all too well. It has a fancier name, like "The Heights" or "The Hills." We call it "The Hunt," and for most of the past 20 years, the Buffalo Bills lived in there.

It was a seasonal place with an odd season, the middle weeks of December. By then, the good NFL teams had articulated themselves, the really shitty ones had fallen out of contention, but every Sunday, CBS and Fox would show the playoff brackets to date with a gaggle of posers still, mathematically, being "In The Hunt" for that elusive final wildcard or the One Sucky Division title. That graphic ALWAYS included a charging buffalo logo within it.

Never with them ever having any real chance of rising out of that pack with the tough roads ahead of them, which always seemed to involve a Christmas weekend trip to Fucksborough.

But still, a chance. And we played the ESPN playoff machine, assumed we'd win out and Denver and KC would tie in week 17 to let us sneak in.

And hey, it happened in 2017! Ending the 17-year playoff drought so we could just lose again!

It took all of those 17 preceding years and a couple after- with a new owner, GM and coach- to finally put in a process we could trust. Now at last, the Bills left The Hunt...and promptly sold their house there to the Mets:P

Five out with, now after last night's events, nineteen to play. Mostly against teams we're looking up at. Four more with the shitty team that can't consistently beat anybody BUT us. Three each against the one in our way to a wildcard and the one holding down the spot in The Heights we gave them back in August.

Hell, we couldn't hold a seven game lead with 17 to play in recent memory. So hope comes from our worst of memories.

Good thing ESPN doesn't have a playoff machine for MLB. Mets fan would be breaking it.

Cutting Your Losses....

♫I've been one poor correspondent, and I've been too, too hard to find
But it doesn't mean you ain't been on my mind♫

So begins my first in-season blog post of 2017, just as the Mets end their interminable month-and-change of nonstop contention against our own pretty wussy divison. When you pack five teams as the basic unit of measurement, it's mathematically necessary to have at least one of the five paired up against a non-division opponent every day, and yet the schedule makers managed to exempt the Mets (or punish them, depending on your point of view) from this reality, giving them their first 30 games of the season exclusively against the 19-a-year opponents known mostly this year as the National League Least.

Only six of those 30 were against genuine Nat-position, which the Mets came remarkably close to splitting after going 0-3 at home before salvaving two of the first three at Parc de Nationale or whatever the Expos call their home venue these days.  Yet despite having 24 other contests against the three other dregs of the division, here we sit at 14-16 going into the first series outside the division tomorrow night.

Two games stand out among those first 30 for incompetence and mismanagement. First, that of just a week ago, where Thor was sent out with a chance to sweep the Nationals but instead got swept onto the DL in short order and a parade of pitchers, ending with our third-string catcher now famed for other things, gave up the team's second-highest run total for a single game in 55 years.  Not to be outdone, today's chance to sweep Miami at home, and end the early division series at ".500 Despite All The Injuries," came up a game (and, admit it, seven runs) short because Harvey Day turned into Harvey Suspended Day just before gametime and his sudden successor got bombed in his debut.

Reports are that Dark Knight blew off his non-start Saturday appearance in Flushing in favor of a Saturday tee time. This follows the events of last weekend, where management fucked up Noah's injury and tried to press Matt into service a day before a scheduled start (and a day after a heavy scheduled weight workout). The results were losses in both Thor's and Matt's scheduled starts.  Bats went crazy the next three nights and brought the Mets within a game of the early-season-barometer of .500, but today's suspension led directly to a 7-0 loss and a 14-16 record with much of the Eastern Easy pickins now behind us.

None of this can be making Mattman, or his agent, happy. Which leads to only one logical conclusion: trade the dude for the right deal for additional offense, preferably to an AL team.

I know. Met history is full of bad moves in this regard, from Ryan to Seaver, more recently from Scott to Kazmir. But this is a guy who has been destined for the Bronx since before any of us had ever heard of him. He's been dissed(respected) and missed(used) in his tenure, and is likely a goner at the first opportunity.  Yeah, he'll no-hit us at some point, but that's just one game out of 162.  We need to get over fucking .500, and our chances at the moment are better without him than with him.

How Can You Mend a Broken Jim Ray Hart?

After a night like that, and with all the history of those conquering Brobdignagians from Coogan's Bluff to Candlestick Point, why was my first random memory of such a puny Giant from the 1960s and early 70s?

I had that card:P

Maybe I thought he was the guy on those rarely-winning Friscans who always got hit by pitches. (Nope, that wasn't Hart but Hunt- an original Met who went on to San Fran and, sadly, never came back.)  Turns out Jim Ray Hart died earlier this year, remembered for nothing extraordinary at all.

Or maybe it was most appropriate for me to remember an unmemorable Giant after last night- because it was perhaps the most unmemorable member of their 2016 lineup, playing against the Basket of Unmemorables we were reduced to in the top of the ninth including Eric Campbell, Ty Kelly and some random number of Riveras.  We weren't done in by Posey; we bridged the Span (and even threw him out- sort of;); even Hunter Pence's horrifics to Harambe didn't hurt us (much)-

- but it was, as Met Fan Andy Who Didn't Know It Was Me promptly named him, Conor F. Gillaspie.  You know what the F stands for. It's the same middle name as Yadier Molina's.

Yeah, that was a scripted ending right there.  The one-time Giant prospect, drafted in 2008 between Buster Posey and Brandon Crawford, fizzled out, then wandered round several teams, finally coming back to his original team this season, and likely only in this game because of injury.  HE doesn't hit home runs.  If HE had either made an out or merely advanced the inning, the Mad Bummer would've been out of the game for the bottom of the ninth.  So what better way to end the Mets' completely improbable season than with something completely improbable?

It was over at that moment.  Just like 1986's final Game Seven was a mere procedural to get to the required ending.  Having the heart of our order up against the Bum wasn't going to do a thing, and it didn't.

I was happy for their enthusiasm.  I hope the Cubs swallow them whole and end their curse.

Most importantly, I'm happy for us.  I briefly compared last night to Oh How We Laughed when the Yankees were reduced to a One-and-Done home game last October, losing to the Astros in a half-empty Stadium.  I didn't see a banner for that "triumph" (or even any of The Sacred Twenty-Seven- as I said at the time, they would've blocked out the sun).  Our brief appearance in post-seasonage last night probably will earn a mention next to 99-00-06-15- and deservedly so.

This was not a sparsely-attended wake in the Bronx. This was 44,747 crazed individuals taking off and landing for every strikeout. (Howie was quick to catch the airplane reference in the attendance, as well as the number of knee replacement surgeries likely to come out of all those KaKe-walks.  Good on the K counters, too, for putting Jose Fernandez's 16 at the start of the line- and good on old pal Angel Pagan, their number 16, for honoring the lost 16 in his uniform number.)

This was an audience that came as close as ever to witnessing a post-season no-hitter from Thor.  An audience that did see Curtis Granderson channel the ghost of Tommie Agee against the padded center field wall.  An audience that hung in until the final out, endured the onfield celebration of the New York Giants who gave their city the Harlem Shake and realized- we're getting our pitchers back!  We taught the kids that they can play, too! It's an odd-numbered year next season and these idiots in orange and black will suck again!

It's enough to warm your Hart:)


These Jokers are Wild:)

As 2016 (regular edition) comes to a close today, with anywhere from one to twenty games remaining in it, we take note of how Amazin' it was that we got even this far in the face of so much adversity.  Yet, when we look back at the events of the previous year, where we boldly went almost as far as we'd only gone twice before, there was plenty of overcome adversity in that season, too.  The loss of Wheeler; the stupidity of Mejia; the stenosis of Spine; the untrade of Flores; the spikes of Utley.  We overcame and forgave (except for Utley) all of it, leaving just one unpardonable sin on the Mets themselves in the entire judgment roll of the 2015 season:

The fucked-up handling of the rainout with the post-game Steve Miller Band at the end of June.

This one was all on our still-hated ownership.  All those other adversities were overcome either by the GM or the manager and coaching staffs (from Flushing to Vegas to the Al Carpentier Little League field in East Meadow where our projected NLDS Game Five starter is likely coming from) to the players themselves.  This was plain Wilpon buffoonery.  Our ever-present Metstradamus, who of course caused the rainout in the first place by showing up, wound up being screwed over by the way the front office handled the logistics after that:

The Mets meanwhile played six innings in garbage weather. And fans that sat through that nonsense get to exchange their tickets for one game only … Sunday’s pre-existing game against the Reds with the Steve Miller Band concert coming after that game instead of Saturday. Fans also get to see the completion of Saturday’s suspended game. Fine for the majority of people that are able to pick up and go tomorrow. But some people made other plans for tomorrow. Some people live far away and can’t make that trip twice in two days, and only did so today because there was a game and a concert. And some people don’t work 9-to-5 Monday to Friday. And baseball people … of all people … should understand that.   But they obviously don’t. And now I, being in one of the latter camps, will not get to see the completion of Saturday’s game, Sunday’s game, or the Steve Miller Band concert. And I’m just going to have to live with the six innings of rainy baseball that I bought for $100.

So it took this season's ragtag bunch of Last Men Standing to bring that concert to life for Mr. Metstra.


We had Jokers.  What else to call a bunch of no-names from the home of confiscatory card games- who get called up, flown almost clear across the country (and sometimes halfway back) and STILL perform?

We have a Smoker. Who proved he was not better than Addison Reed the one time Terry Collins overthought a matchup, but we're happy to have him.

I'm sure there was a Midnight Toker in there someplace. Granted, this is more a Buffalo Bills thing, but probably someone in that clubhouse was growing something stronger than Joe Pignatano's bullpen tomatoes.

We went from Phoenix, Arizona..... remember that lowest of the low points?  A week after a promised feast on the lowly dwellers of the desert cellar, at home no less, that turned into a three-game sweep of the Mets, we returned to the B.O.B. and got B.E.A.T. another two out of three.  Here's where upper-floor windows started opening- some with Network-like cries of "FIRE EVERYBODY!" and others preparing for plunges to the ground below.

...all the way to Tacoma.... okay, the Mets don't play the Rainiers, but these Mets did. In fact, the same weekend as the Mets' nadir point in San Francisco in August, the 51s were in Tacoma, where they, at least, managed to split a four-game series.

....Philadelphia, Atlanta, LA.... all three loomed large as the Aliens returned to their MIB/MLB launching pad and turned the final weeks of this season into something unthinkable.  LA was off our schedule by late August, but Dem Bums still had home field to play for and plenty of games against Cards and Giants to help narrow the gap.  Atlanta proved to be a problem toward the end, with only two out of those final six meetings producing much-needed W's.  Ah, but I really dig that Philadelphia bullpen.    Even the game we lost, we pretty much won.

Which brings us to Northern California, where the team is warm in even-numbered years. And thanks to tiebreakers, it will either be them, or possibly Cardinals, hopping on that big old jet airliner to our Third World airport next door.  Until then, time keeps on ticking, ticking ticking into the very near future.  Citi Field will fill at least one more time, Jeffy will Take the Money and Run, Cespedes and Grandy and Bruuuuuce (sorry for the mixed Met-aphor), and for all I know Big Sexy again, will remember that we've got to get down to Swingtown.

And no matter what happens, we're gonna Fly Like a Banner come next April.


A Post About Nothing.

Seems fitting, considering Jerry Seinfeld's long-professed love of this team, that my first post in ages would be a post about not posting.  But I have to. There's too much going on of importance- to the next 22 games and those beyond. Against staggering odds, the Mets have climbed back into a virtual tie for the second wild card, are in striking distance of the first, and as long as they can come within 7 games of the Murphinals with 17 to play, I rule nothing out.  There are questions about the current roster's health, the returns of various injured guys, the long term prospects for re-signing key components of this year's team, and even the weather over the next four weeks could prove significant.

I have no time or patience for any discussion of Sideshow Bob- or whatever his name is.

I'm sure the World Wide Leader will try to bleed this meaninglessness for all it's worth.  But face it- the only significance won't arise until next summer, and then only to the good fans of either Binghamton or Brooklyn, and only if anything comes of this nonsense.  They'll sell a lot of tickets, and create a bunch of merch, but I don't want to see it or read about it.

I suppose it would be fun to subject You Know Who to having to pray in a Stud Muffins jersey.

On second thought: No. Just No. So keep your bullhead out of my face, plzkthx.


Most other regulars on the Mets blogging circuit have thrown in their two cents on the Jose Reyes re-signing, so I'll throw mine in to the pot, as well. Besides the generally abhorrent nature of the domestic violence charge against him, I've seen, and respect, an opinion about his conduct in his final game as a Met in 2011- when he got a hit to clinch the NL batting title, immediately came out of the game, and did nothing to acknowledge his fans in that half-inning or thereafter.

That's the easier charge to address: unlike his later conduct, I think that, at that time, it was understandable if not defensible.  Reyes had been a Met throughout his development.  He'd been part of the young-star core of the team along with David Wright, coming to within an inning of reaching the 2006 World Series.  He'd survived the double tanks of the ensuing two seasons, the subsequent move to Ebbets Vault, and the slow termination of talent around him. By the end of the 2011 season, the Mets hadn't- and ultimately wouldn't- try to make even the most minimal effort to commit to him.  So I can understand his feelings as he rounded first and headed to an inevitable new home.

Two years later, after he'd realized the error of signing with perhaps the only owner in baseball worse than a Wilpon, I saw him here- playing on rehab for the Buffalo Bisons, the team now affiliated, as he was, with the Toronto Blue Jays.  Though he was now older, injured (hence the rehab) and had suffered yet another management betrayal, it was still the old Jose that I could see.  From my game recap of it at the time:

He almost beat out a routine grounder to first as the Bison leadoff hitter. Here he is, coming back to the dugout after that:

He then reached on an infield hit in the fourth (then Buffalo's first baserunner) and almost tried to stretch it to a double. He followed that by trying to steal second four times, all four being fouled off, before finally taking off on a hit-and-run that almost ended with him landing safely on third.  He ended the appearances I witnessed with a nasty comebacker to the pitcher that would have been a hit if it hadn't line-shotted right into the dude's glove.  When he went down in the ninth, I headed out....

and after the game the following night, so did he, back to The Show- but only after leaving his AAA teammates with a major-league spread in the clubhouse to thank them for helping with his rehab.

I next saw him in 2014, at an August Rockies game at Citi Field. He didn't show quite the spark against the Mets that he once had for them, but I wondered, in that still-almost-giddy stretch where 90 wins was the goal, whether he might find his way back to the Mets at some future point.

And now, he has- but only because of the horrific off-field events during last year's post-season.  You might wonder whether I could ever tolerate such a return, given how outspoken I've been about shunning, to the point of "Voldemort"-ing their names, any number of celebrities caught perpetuating assault against women.

The jury here is still deliberating. On the side of "dead to me" are two things:

* What he did; and

* Whatever he did, whether out of coercion or contrition, to get his wife to stop cooperating with the prosecution.

Supporting forgiveness, on the other hand, we have:

* He has expressed contrition, unlike those who Must Not Be Named, who deny charges of rape and even incest against them from victims with no motive for lying;

* He has served his time on the non-criminal sentence meted out by MLB for his actions; and

* Although he's mostly going to be paid in Rockiebucks with the Mets kicking in only the veteran minimum, he will always have to endure the stigma, and the watchful eyes of team and media and fans, reminding him that forgiving does not mean forgetting- and he will have to take what he is given in terms of a role, be it third base or outfield or pine rider- choices he would not have had to agree to had he come back to New York under better circumstances.

And so, I reach at least an initial verdict- a conditional one, at that.  I will not cut off my team in the fiftieth year of my fandom on account of what he did or what they have now done.  I will cheer any heads-up play he produces on the field or in the batter's box.  But I propose that the Mets stick with a simple and visible statement from his first day on the field that he is not, and will never be, the Jose Reyes we once loved:

No Number Seven.

Never mind that it's already taken by TDA.  Do not for a moment permit one of those clubhouse deals that enable switches regardless. It's probably best to turn to the expert on the subject, and that would be Mets By The Numbers, which has already thought of the same two things- one probably wrong and one ultimately right- that I did:

Back in 2003, when Reyes was a but a Met puppy, the Mets (idiotically, it turned out) signed the Japanese free agent Kaz Matsui to a contract. Matsui wore 7 in Japan and some bright people suggested then they creatively solve the issue by giving Matsui 77. They didn’t. Things would have been different, I tell you.

So I can see the Mets going that route, maybe. Perhaps, though, presenting Reyes with 77 (or even 07) is too larded with tender forethought to be appropriate for a guy coming off a wife-beating rap. I am coming around to the idea it would be best if Reyes gets a number that sends the message that the Mets aren’t doing Jose Reyes any favors beyond the opportunity to wear a uniform. Any uniform. Give him No. 46. It’ll all be a weird scene anyway.

Perfect. No single digit. No number worn by anyone remotely famed in our past or our future, to taint it if it ever comes up for retirement (since THAT happens so damn often:P)  If you could do it, send him out there as a Man Without a Number. I don't see a lot of merch sales no matter what he does.

And first time you get on base, Jose? Act like you've been here before and salute your fans. Because you



"Oh My God They Killed Padres! You Bastardo!"

I almost titled this with a reference to "killed Kevin," which seemed to work between seeing Kevin Mitchell in the booth late in yesterday's game and then reading this Times tribute to him.  But the real news of late yesterday was the seeming arrival of that all-elusive gateway to the ninth inning in the sometimes shaky person of one Antonio Bastardo.

On a weekend already put in the books for intense weirdness, the setup to Antonio's setup was almost pedestrian in its WTF quotient.  Matt Harvey had his insurance policy canceled in the bottom of the seventh through a quirky infield double, a sacrifice fly barely behind the basepath, and a balk where Jim Henderson basically fell off the rubber.  Then, bottom eight, Blevins and Reed gave much more cause for pause, with three straight singles loading them up and Number 59 getting the Verizon Call to the Bullpen that put the day's minute quota way out of whack.

So what else to expect from a shaky newcomer except a strikeout, an eventually-invoked infield fly popout, and one more swing and miss-K.  From a guy I couldn't have told you for sure was even on the roster.

The lead stayed at one, but who cared? Jeurys was 9-for-9, and before there was even a blink it was 10-for-10.  That, along with some continued help from Chicago, rendered the SD trip a split and the division lead ours.

And now it's Dem Bums who have the long cross-country trip while the Mets have little more than a bus ride.  As something of a Mother's Day accommodation yesterday, I listened to the final innings on MLB At Bat while watching the PIX feed with the sound off; it's quite fun listening to Howie and Josh going somewhat surreal about time travel and margarine company sponsors.  This is my first year in ages with regular access to the radio broadcasts, between the phone app and a Rochester station picking up the Mets Radio Network; I'm still partial to Gary's style and Keith's craziness, but now having to choose between the two is the epitome of First World Problems....

and, as of today, First Place Problems:)

Getting Lost....

Well, at least closer to Lost.

We all remember The Numbers. Six of them, echoing throughout that utterly confusing series of Wednesday nights:

4 8 15 16 23 42

Meanwhile, in the Real Life that is Metropolitans baseball, fifty-four seasons have come and gone, just over 1,000 men have worn the orange and blue, and until today only one's on-our-field accomplishments merited inclusion in what has, seemingly, forever been a foursome:

37 14  41 42

Four numbers. One, not even ours- last worn here by Mo Vaughn, and last first-issuance to a homegrown Met by Butch Huskey. Neither is Hall material, although Butch Huskey should be in the Baseball Name Hall of Fame. Only one of the three homeworn numbers was sported by a Mets player during the peak of his playing career....

Until today. Now we are two:

One has to wonder why this took so damn long.  Across the Triboro, numbers are retired like peanut shells tossed from the bleachers into Monument Park. This past summer added Andy Pettitte and Jorge Posada to the latticework. Nice players, good records, but the quintessence of the Hall of Very Good.  They're up to twenty numbers out there, plus assorted unnumbered Legends™ taking up parkland.  Now they do have a half-century-plus on us, but the Met-agement has been downright miserly over the years with the honor.

I've heard rumors of exclusiveness dating back to Payson days- that one needed Cooperstown cred, derived from their Mets accomplishments, to qualify for exonumerology.  If that remains the case, it explains why one number remains off the wall despite having two plaqued candidates to justify its retirement.  I long ago advocated to Make 8 Great after Gary Carter's sad demise, and to do it while the then-Oldest Living Met, its other main wearer, would be still be old and living enough to see it.

They didn't. He didn't.  But they should.

Clearly, the Wilpons are conscious of the marketing potential for this kind of event. They chose a weekend series against Colorado, hardly a rival or traditional draw.  (Hell, two of my last three randomly chosen Citi visits were against the Rocks.)  The July 31 date also looms significant, because any deficiencies in Trade Deadline Activity will likely get lost in all the Piazzaz of the weekend.

So not this year, but next? We're talkin' Larry (Yogi) and The Kid.  Another sure sellout.

Following that? Keith Hernandez next comes up for Veterans Committee consideration in 2017.    See what I did there?

That would Get The Mets to six orange numbers to never again call their very own:

37 14 41 31 8 17 42

It might even inspire a big lottery win:)

Murphy's Boner, Manager Bonkers, Midnight Baseball.

If you came here because you saw an "adult content" warning connected to this blog, move along. Nothing to see here.  The Murphy in the reference is to 28, and the Boner in the reference is to '08.  Only a few weeks ago, I was extolling the madness of our New York Giant heritage, but I was focused on the reckless abandon of Mays- not the mind-numbing mental error of Merkle.

But that's where this Series took its turn Saturday night.  I admit- I was out by that point.  These 8-and-past p.m.. starts and painfully long commercial breaks keep the action going way past my functionality- and I had a busy morning and company coming Sunday with two dogs in tow, so I left at seventh inning stretch time with the score 3-2.

As it was when this happened:

Heroes and goats, and they're all the same. We would not have been playing past the second week of October if Murph hadn't been Supermurph for that amazing stretch. We likely wouldn't have gotten past October 4 if Cespedes hadn't been equally super for August and September. They got us to the penultimate game they eventually cost us.

Likewise, last night: Duda's throw to the plate balanced, but never canceled, his Herculean effort at just the right time to get the Mets into this Series.  That throw was far less significant than the decision to throw Matt Harvey out top nine, and even worse to keep him there after walking the leadoff man.  That was Terry's Boner, and he admits it now.

In the end, though? This World Series was essentially decided in southern Ohio in the early part of July, when the Mets' offense was at its woeiest. That's when an AL All-Star team, consisting largely of these same Royals thanks to their ballot-stuffing fans, beat deGrom (not so much) and the rest of the National League (a lot more) and "won" home field by virtue of carrying off the latest Bingo Long Bud Selig Traveling All-Star Circus of Stupid Award.  If Bud Black had done a better managing job that night, the Mets would have had the first and last two at home.  It's worth noting that both of our World Championship clinchings came on our own home field; the valiant effort of '73 failed in the late-day Oakland sun, and the loss in 2000 was their Last World Series Play At Shea, a game which also ended near the stroke of midnight.

This team overcame so much adversity, so often, that we came to expect it. Yet it was the opposition, this time, which came from behind to win each of the four corners of their trophy.  At the end, I was sick to death of their enthusiasm in their dugout, of the constant camera shots of Dyson doing the fucking whip a nae nae behind Addison "I'm not even supposed to be here today" Reed, of every one of their batters fouling eight pitches before finally hitting one where they ain't.

They, however, are the foreshadowing of us. They lost, they learned. We will have the most amazin' rotation in the world next year. Our superbats will be either back or backed up.  Our fans can stuff the ballot box to put eight Mets into the ASG lineup- and our manager will be managing them.  And then we can win one at home- for me, for you, for Nelson Doubleday and Yogi Berra and Bill Webb and Gary Carter.  Even for the Wilpons, if they can manage to get a champagne bottle open:P

This morning dawned warm and sunny in Buffalo. (The Sabres beat the Islanders before a near-empty house in Brooklyn yesterday.) We still believe. Pitchers and catchers in 110 days.

The Bore Before the Storm

Nothing to be done.

So begins the script of Waiting for Godot.  In the case of baseball, we have to call it Losing All the Mo.

Certainly none of us expected a sweep of the NLCS when they set out the schedule; if anybody at the league or network offices had, they likely would've thought it would've been something like the Cardinals over the Pirates in four, but certainly not the LOLMETS.

So instead of last night being Must See TV on TBS, it was No See TV for MLB.  The Jays and Royals needed that mandatory full off-day for clearing customs and exchanging their loonies, so by yesterday afternoon, everybody outside WFAN went back to talkin' football and NBA and whatever that other minor sport is that occasionally gets a mention on national sports media.

Things do get back to American business tonight, and possibly tomorrow night. That will still leave two whole blackout days before the Mets return to a playing field, whatever state or country that field might be in.

I've never understood the need to pre-program the dates of multi-game playoff rounds.  It's not like they can make advance hotel reservations, not knowing who will be playing and (except for the ludicrous All-Star Game Rule) who will have home-field.  And sure, knowing the games will be on X,Y, Zed and Zed Alpha dates might help the media and even some fans do some planning- but they still can't plan on the where or even the times of day- or, whenever possible, of night.

That latter decision appears to be driven entirely by TV ratings.  How else can you explain this past week's decision to run all ALCS games in the afternoon and all NLCS games at night whenever there was a conflict?  It must've been especially Maddoning on Saturday, when Cubs and Mets were forced to play outdoors in full nijab wear while there was a much warmer venue in Kansas City shut down for the evening.

These were then followed by two straight nights where MLB chose to ignore the existence of a climate-controlled venue and sent the Mets and Cubs out into the evening elements.  Play a day game at Wrigley Field? We've never done THAT!  The participants were fortunate this time that the cold weather stayed away from those games- but as Game Three wound down, the rain started coming down. Lots of it. Enough of it for me to have my only real worry of the entire series- that we'd be stuck in a bottom-nine rain delay into Halloween morning and our closer would have a CLOSED sign on him by the time play resumed.

As it turned out, the afternoon weather in Toronto was perfectly nice both afternoons- but the Lords decreed the lid be sealed.  That alone messed with the pitching preferences of R.A. Dickey, and his performance showed it.  Maybe they were just trying to keep Rob Ford from breaking in through an open roof, but still.

There has yet to be a rain delay of any of these games, but there's rain in the KC forecast for today, so maybe we need the potential three extra days of nothingness before Game One gets going.  Still- it makes me shiver- with antici....


Hey. If you're gonna still be playing baseball on Halloween, you may as well have a Frank with your beer.